{"id":649,"date":"2013-08-04T22:02:02","date_gmt":"2013-08-04T22:02:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.happycyclist.org\/?p=649"},"modified":"2013-08-04T22:02:02","modified_gmt":"2013-08-04T22:02:02","slug":"dangerous-driving-road-rage-bully-the-result","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/?p=649","title":{"rendered":"Dangerous driving, road rage bully &#8211; the result."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At the end of June, I wrote <a href=\"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/?p=631\">here<\/a> (with a video of the incident) about the poor police response to what I considered to be a very serious road rage incident. In that post, I pasted the police complaint that I submitted as a result.<\/p>\n<p>Over the following month, I was in communication with the Inspector who was investigating my complaint and I now have the outcome regarding the original incident.<\/p>\n<p>I should say that I have been very happy with the way my police complaint itself has been handled. The key points that I take away from this are below.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The failure to issue a Notice of Intention to Prosecute (NIP) was due to a breakdown in inter-department communications. I have been assured that steps are being taken to improve procedures in relation to this.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The Inspector agrees that, had a NIP been served in due time, the case should have gone to court. We disagree on what the appropriate charge should be: he says careless driving, but I think it should be dangerous driving or even assault (see my earlier article). In discussion, it became clear that I was not going to get anywhere regarding an assault charge, but see my comments below.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I was informed yesterday that the driver has been spoken to and issued with a formal warning under Section 59 of the Police Reform Act 2002. Unfortunately I got the distinct impression that the driver still denies that he did anything wrong.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Regarding the question that I posed in the title of my earlier article (&#8220;Do the police have an ingrained prejudice against cyclists?&#8221;), I&#8217;m no longer sure. Perhaps my original report might have been taken more seriously had I not been a cyclist, but perhaps not. However, what is very clear to me is that I do believe it probably would have been taken more seriously if the offender had used a knife or a broken bottle to threaten me rather than a 1.5 tonne, 150bhp machine.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Overall, I am satisfied with the final outcome. Section 59 of the Police Reform Act states:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">&#8220;Where a constable in uniform has reasonable grounds for believing that a motor vehicle is being used on any occasion in a manner which\u2014<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><em>(a) contravenes section 3 or 34 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52) (careless and inconsiderate driving and prohibition of off-road driving), and<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><em>(b) is causing, or is likely to cause, alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the public,<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em><\/em><em>he shall have the powers set out in subsection (3).&#8221;<\/em><em id=\"__mceDel\"><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n<p>This fits reasonably well with the actions of the driver in this case. \u00a0The powers referred to involve the confiscation of the offender&#8217;s vehicle if a second offence is committed (within 12 months) after a warning has been served.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the end of June, I wrote here (with a video of the incident) about the poor police response to what I considered to be a very serious road rage incident. In that post, I pasted the police complaint that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/?p=649\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,8],"tags":[17],"class_list":["post-649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article","category-roadjustice","tag-policecomplaints"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/happycyclist.grahamecooper.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}